RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03307
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His leave be restored.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His unit was minimally manned and assigned personnel were not allowed to take adequate leave. The first sergeant submitted requests for multiple personnel; however, the requests were denied. Personnel were advised that submitting a request to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records would restore their leave.
The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of his request. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of captain.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. On 26 Sep 11, the applicant was sent a letter requesting additional documentation to support his claim. Specifically, the amount of leave he lost, the fiscal year that he lost the leave, and a letter from his commander stating he was not provided the opportunity to use leave or documentation revealing he was denied leave due to mission requirements. However, the applicant failed to submit the requested supporting documentation.
AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, states in part that the wing commander or equivalent approves special leave accrual for their organization. The members application for restoration of lost leave must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the members lost leave.
IAW AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, the applicant has the burden of providing sufficient evidence of material error or injustice.
The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Dec 11, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has not received a response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 28 Feb 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2011-03307:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Aug 11.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 Dec 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Dec 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04458
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01730
She was profiled [sic] from taking leave while undergoing the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) processes. DPSIM states that IAW AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, a members application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the members lost leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04876
Then, she was on convalescent leave and in rehabilitation until 17 Sep 11, and not permitted to leave the local area due to her medical condition. The applicant lost 16 days of leave because her extensive convalescent leave and rehabilitation precluded her from taking ordinary leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01333
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01333 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 25.5 days of leave be restored and she receive payment for those days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01886
According to the applicants Master Military Pay Account statement dated 12 Dec 2012, he lost 15 days of leave in FY12. Requests must clearly establish that an error or injustice caused by the Air Force prevented the member from using the lost leave. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Feb 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04460
Members application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the members lost leave. If the Board restores leave to current leave account, members must use these days before the end of the current FY. On 29 Nov 2011, DPSIMC requested additional documentation from the applicant to support his claim; specifically orders received from all deployments that prevented him from using the lost four days of leave during FY 2011. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02579
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C, D, G and H. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the applicants request to have his leave restored be granted. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicants request...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02205 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirty days of lost leave be reinstated. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Although the applicant lost 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01001
His wing commander agreed that he should be restored 10 days of leave and approved a Special Leave Accrual (SLA) request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he was deployed on Contingency Exercise Deployment (CED) orders prior to starting his already- approved ten days of use/lose leave for FY12. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01612
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01612 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4 days of lost leave be restored. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains SLA shall not be a means to authorize the accumulation of leave in excess of 60 days (75 days from 1 October 2008 through 30 September 2013) when it is a result of the...